5 ms·
What seems to often go unsaid in these discussions is that the choice isn't between cloud and colo. There's a third, hugely popular and mature option: dedicated
by latch 7y ago
What seems to often go unsaid in these discussions is that the choice isn't between cloud and colo. There's a third, hugely popular and mature option: dedicated providers - which address all of your issues.
It's convenient for cloud vendors to have people believe the choice is between them or having to deal with hardware.
- dhruvkar 7y agowhat's an example of a dedicated provider? I also worked in ITOps at a medium-ish company and we were moving our colo to Azure, when I left.
- arianvanp 7y agoHetzner, scaleway and packet.net come to mind
- acjacobson 7y agoRackspace
- jethro_tell 7y agoThe guys that are selling managed services on AWS?
- Karunamon 7y agoThey sell all of those those things. RS has their fingers in many pies, even though some of them appear to conflict at first glance.
- latch 7y agoThere are thousands (tens of thousands?). OVH is probably the biggest by server count. Softlayer arguably had the most potential (prior to its IBM acquisition). Hivelocity, ReliableSite, WebNX, Hetzner, LeaseWeb, Online.net, DataPacket, QuadraNet, PhoenixNap, ...
- dijit 7y agoi3d.net will give you a machine, with as hands-on support as you want up to even patching the OS.
- yzmtf2008 7y agoBut isn't dedicated providers a subset of cloud providers? I can see how having a focused provider with a narrow mission might be beneficial in some cases, but I can't say it's that much of an advantage compared to the ecosystem & convenience of a cloud provider.