2 ms·

[2006] Also, checking out the abstract of the paper (https://science.sciencemag.org/content/314/5800/787.long https://science.sciencemag.org/content/314/5800/7

[2006] Also, checking out the abstract of the paper (https://science.sciencemag.org/content/314/5800/787.long https://science.sciencemag.org/content/314/5800/787.long , paywalled, but it must be on scihub if someone has a moment) doesn’t mention extinction of anything. Presumably, predicting the apocalypse would merit a line there, right? Climate change is real and awful, but hysteric doom-mongering reporting about it does far more harm than good. Compare the D.A.R.E. model of communicating about drugs to people.

xupybd 7y ago
Alarmist claims like this do tend to fuel climate change denial.
- slackfan 7y ago
  It's pretty much why the green movement lost me. When I was growing up - we were supposed to have no snow by 2015, and all the wales were supposed to dead. I see the value in clean water, clean air, biodiversity, and living in harmony with nature. However scaremongering and wild predictions (the latest one I heard seems to be that we have 12 years?), is an easy way to drive me away from the movement as a whole. Even though I agree that emissions should be cut, fuck the crazies I ain't dealing with their shit.