3 ms·
Not sure what the agenda is here but this reads like a piece sponsored by rich people intended to test the waters in terms of public opinion. I think that geoe
by tmpfs 7y ago
Not sure what the agenda is here but this reads like a piece sponsored by rich people intended to test the waters in terms of public opinion.
I think that geoengineering should only ever be done by consensus not unilaterally and only when we have a really good idea of the consequences after all our current situation has been brought about by myopic views on new technology.
Stopped reading when the article diverged into an imaginary future.
No, thank you.
- ForHackernews 7y ago> this reads like a piece sponsored by rich people intended to test the waters in terms of public opinion. I kinda doubt it. Pacific Standard has a left-liberal editorial slant and is generally skeptical of billionaires. To the extent this piece has an agenda, it's probably to scare voters into taking action on climate change through democratic policy, or else risk the rich going rouge and poisoning the skies.