4 ms·
You forget that there is a significant and very vocal segment in education and academia opposed to such standardized exams as the exams are perceived to undermi
by Macross8299 7y ago
You forget that there is a significant and very vocal segment in education and academia opposed to such standardized exams as the exams are perceived to undermine equity and social justice.
Which may very well be a valid point, given the explosion of the SAT prep cottage industry.
- strikelaserclaw 7y agoMost people who go to ivy league are already from the top 1%. From statistics i read a while ago, like 30-40% of ivy league students have household income 300,000 +. There will never be a world in which a child of a single mother working a minimum wage job will ever have a fair competition against a double household of both doctors as parents but with exams this unfairness is slightly reduced. At the very least, unqualified people with rich parents won't get a free ride. The whole elite school MO of admitting a couple under-qualified poor kids is just lip service so people don't question the real injustice going on.
- tzs 7y ago> Most people who go to ivy league are already from the top 1% That's way off. Harvard is 15% from the top 1% [1], and that's typical for Ivy League. [1] https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/projects/college-mobility/harvard-university https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/projects/college-mobilit...
- jshowa3 7y agoThe top 1% shouldn't be about wealth period. It should be about holistic merit with first come, first serve basis. It should be accessible to anyone. Wealth is what caused celebrities to pay millions of dollars for guaranteed admittance.