4 ms·
Ok, I get if they're looking to scale and have them on multiple machines. But I tend to use namedpipes and/or shared memory because I need fast access between m
by throwaway55554 7y ago
Ok, I get if they're looking to scale and have them on multiple machines. But I tend to use namedpipes and/or shared memory because I need fast access between multiple services on the same machine. I don't need to scale.
- GordonS 7y agoYou can use named pipes without WCF[0]. Sample here[1]. I've also used the IpcServiceFramework[2] before, and it worked a treat. [0] https://github.com/dotnet/docs/blob/master/docs/standard/io/how-to-use-named-pipes-for-network-interprocess-communication.md https://github.com/dotnet/docs/blob/master/docs/standard/io/... [1] https://github.com/GustavoHennig/PipePoc https://github.com/GustavoHennig/PipePoc [2] https://github.com/jacqueskang/IpcServiceFramework https://github.com/jacqueskang/IpcServiceFramework