>it's government encroaching on the rights of companies and just as big of a danger to free speech itself. Saying "Legal, but wrong" doesn't mean he wants the

>it's government encroaching on the rights of companies and just as big of a danger to free speech itself. Saying "Legal, but wrong" doesn't mean he wants the government to make it illegal. Your post is arguing in circles unless you can quote the part where he advocates for changing the law. Have you considered the possibility he may be calling on a company to choose to live up to a moral principle, while also supporting their legal right not to? >forcing companies to serve customers that they don't want to is not the way to win this battle. Again, where does he call for this?