2 ms·

I'm glad that you agree that diplomats should have secure communications, but, secure != private, seems semantic.

• dalke 16y ago
  Then let's talk about the specific case of the Cuban Missile Crisis. The negotiation was secure and done in secrecy. That secret wasn't made public until many years later. The communications was secure. The information is no longer a secret. Is it still private? If secure == private then do you consider legal document declassification the same as a security hole? A breaking of privacy?
  • deleted 16y ago
    [deleted]