3 ms·
I said I agreed with both of the parent's points, namely: 1. That's under "Ideally", not "Requirements". 2. I think that's a great idea. :-)
by raganwald 16y ago
I said I agreed with both of the parent's points, namely:
1. That's under "Ideally", not "Requirements".
2. I think that's a great idea.
:-)
- catshirt 16y agoAh- of course I did see that- but I misinterpreted the rest as a "I agree, but you could consider it a requirement because...". Rereading it I realize that's not the case. Cheers!
- davemorin 16y agoWe should probably have made this a requirement. I'll push a change now :) Also, thank you for the kind words on this. We think it is an important part of the responsibilities for this post at Path.