5 ms·
From the linked El Reg article: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/12/07/mcnealy_sun_and_open_source/ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/12/07/mcnealy_sun_and_ope
by chrisaycock 16y ago
From the linked El Reg article: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/12/07/mcnealy_sun_and_open_source/ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/12/07/mcnealy_sun_and_open...
> Sun should, McNealy told us, have sold and supported Solaris on its own x86 hardware. Instead, Sun took the fatal decision of outsourcing that role: it placed its trust in OEMs such as Dell to sell and support Sun's Unix on their Intel boxes. Problem was, these were the very same OEMs who, it emerged during the US Department of Justice's (DoJ) antitrust prosecution of Microsoft, had had their arms twisted into offering only Windows with Internet Explorer on PCs or risk losing access to Windows on their machines.
- nailer 16y agoPeople don't like using Solaris. Regardless of the recent kernel innovations, the userspace - packaging, compiler toolchain, command line UI and GUI, support for modern keyboard layouts in vi - most people prefer GNU to Sun, and Sun never addressed this. Sol 10 had some great stuff in kernelspace, but a shitty userland on x86 wouldn't have solved Sun's problems.