The quoted comment could read as just blaming poorer people etc, which is how I read it at first, after further digging the comment seems justified. Reading you

The quoted comment could read as just blaming poorer people etc, which is how I read it at first, after further digging the comment seems justified. Reading your comment I can't see another reason for the downvote, and antibiotic resistance being more common in developing nations wasn't something I was that aware of, so I was confirming to others you aren't being racist or anything. Maybe they should have done their own research? I don't know. The sample size of one in the article by itself doesn't justify the sweeping statement you made. Ultimately and unfortunately people will say unsubstantiated and unpleasant things and some reasonable comments get caught in people's 'spam filter'.