Absolutely! I would say 90% isn't high enough when you consider the amount of time reviewing pull requests on a large team. Add to that the reading required whe

Absolutely! I would say 90% isn't high enough when you consider the amount of time reviewing pull requests on a large team. Add to that the reading required when deciding on an external library (yes, some people simply use only popularity metrics and Github repo signals like number of issues etc. Fair enough. Our team tries to skim the entire code at least once.) We also do team code reviews on a big screen over pizza twice a month. It gives a chance for the entire team to learn something new without being under pressure. So yea, lots of reading happens around here. The side-effect is some pretty good (and readable) code IMHO.