3 ms·

I agree, calling it low was not quite correct. See the thread above: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19828567 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19828567

by gavv42 7y ago

I agree, calling it low was not quite correct. See the thread above: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19828567 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19828567 I didn't perform serious testing on latencies below 100ms yet. I've added to my todo that we should investigate the minimum supported latency.

voldacar 7y ago
I wish you luck with your project! sorry if my comment was snarky but a lot of modern software seems to essentially not care about latency or responsiveness, and it's something that bothers me more and more these days
- gavv42 7y ago
  Thanks :)