2 ms·
If there is such a number (which there almost certainly is; literal 0 unemployment strikes me as very unhealthy), then you obviously need to specify which versi
by gizmo686 8y ago
If there is such a number (which there almost certainly is; literal 0 unemployment strikes me as very unhealthy), then you obviously need to specify which version of unemployment you are stating it against. As long as they continue to move in lock-step, they are effectivly measuring the same thing.