> I made this account just to reply to you, because as of now, I sincerely think you are either uninformed or lying. Gee, you sure got me there. Ok, so let's s

> I made this account just to reply to you, because as of now, I sincerely think you are either uninformed or lying. Gee, you sure got me there. Ok, so let's say you mercifully bestow upon me the benefit of the doubt that I did not remember the exact details of the incident. How does that change the thrust of the argument? The argument was the reason for mass surveillance and communication controls in the region is that social media was deliberately used to exaggerate facts and foment outrage, leading to the butchering of 200 innocent Han Chinese in the street and the injury of thousands more. How does your first point contradict that argument? To your second point, once again. That detail is literally inconsequential. Substitute WeChat for [whatever social media platform they were using at the time to circulate videos]. I ask again, what exactly does that change? Very interested in reading your response.