3 ms·
Well at least to me, the author and to some society, both are technically fact and both are technically correct.
by matz1 8y ago
Well at least to me, the author and to some society, both are technically fact and both are technically correct.
- Fezzik 8y agoIn this example, though, we are looking for actionable items. But for the pollution, it appears this girl would have not had respiratory failure. Reducing pollution is the actionable item for addressing the respiratory related illness in this story, and thus the focal point. Writing an article about this person and not mentioning pollution, and writing only about respiratoy failure, would have been utterly pointless. Edit, to add: just because something is true does not make it relevant. It is true that if this woman never would have been born she would not have had respiratory failure caused by pollution and this article never would have been written... but how is stating that helpful?
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]