4 ms·

It's not about distributions, it's about companies. Canonical is not a for-profit, publicly traded company so it doesn't really fit this comparison between sun,

• rmc 16y ago
  Canonical are a for-profit company IIRC, however they are not publically traded and not "cash flow positive" ;)
  • seabee 16y ago
    Not sure why you were downvoted, it's called "Canonical Ltd." and besides, you can't trade stock in a not-for-profit company; parent was way off the mark.
    • pingswept 16y ago
      I think emarcotte was wrong about "for-profit," but right about "not . . . publicly traded."
      • seabee 16y ago
        You're right; I mentally transposed 'not a', which gives the sentence a different spin.