4 ms·

Came here for the same comment. I setup some s3 related stuff less than 2 months ago and the documentation, at least for the js sdk, still recommends the path-s

Came here for the same comment. I setup some s3 related stuff less than 2 months ago and the documentation, at least for the js sdk, still recommends the path-style url. I don't even recall a V1/V2 mentioned. That seems very inconvenient, and is pretty inline with my experience with aws: I guess their services are cheap and good, but oh boy! The developer experience is SO bad. - So many services, it is very hard to know what to use for what - Complex and not user friendly APIs - coming with terrible documentation I'm pretty sure they'd get a lot more business if they invested a bit more in developer friendliness - right now I only use aws if a Client really insists on it, because despite having used it a fair amount, I'm still not happy and comfortable with it.

mabey 7y ago
Out of curiosity what cloud service do you prefer?
- jypepin 7y ago
  To be honest, I don't have much experience with the other cloud services, except Heroku which I wouldnt put in the same category. I have a DO box for myself and their docs/admin panels are better imo. But my comment about aws is not really a comparison, just more a comment about my experience as a non-devops engineer, and how I hate having to read their docs.
jacurtis 7y ago
Except S3 storage isn't actually all that cheap anymore. Amazon has literally never changed the price of S3 storage over the last decade even though storage costs have plummeted over the same time period. There are other providers out there like Digital Ocean Spaces, Wasabi, and Backblaze that offer storage solutions for much cheaper than S3 now. Digital Ocean Spaces and Wasabi in particular actually use the Amazon S3 api for all their storage. This means you can switch over to either of those solutions without changing the programming of your app or the S3 plugins or libraries that you are currently using. The only thing you change is the base url that you make api calls to. Backblaze has their own API, but they also offer a few additional features not offered under S3's api.
- abra559 7y ago
  Uhh....except that they have cut prices a bunch of times in the last decade and launched cheaper storage like one zone
- rsync 7y ago
  "Except S3 storage isn't actually all that cheap anymore. Amazon has literally never changed the price of S3 storage over the last decade even though storage costs have plummeted over the same time period." I don't think that's true ... we (rsync.net) try to very roughly track (or beat) S3 for our cloud storage pricing and we've had to ratchet pricing down several times as a result. I don't think we just imagined it ...
- skywhopper 7y ago
  Please at least get your facts right. They have lowered prices and introduced less expensive options.

mabey 7y ago

Out of curiosity what cloud service do you prefer?

jypepin 7y ago
To be honest, I don't have much experience with the other cloud services, except Heroku which I wouldnt put in the same category. I have a DO box for myself and their docs/admin panels are better imo. But my comment about aws is not really a comparison, just more a comment about my experience as a non-devops engineer, and how I hate having to read their docs.

jacurtis 7y ago

Except S3 storage isn't actually all that cheap anymore. Amazon has literally never changed the price of S3 storage over the last decade even though storage costs have plummeted over the same time period. There are other providers out there like Digital Ocean Spaces, Wasabi, and Backblaze that offer storage solutions for much cheaper than S3 now. Digital Ocean Spaces and Wasabi in particular actually use the Amazon S3 api for all their storage. This means you can switch over to either of those solutions without changing the programming of your app or the S3 plugins or libraries that you are currently using. The only thing you change is the base url that you make api calls to. Backblaze has their own API, but they also offer a few additional features not offered under S3's api.

abra559 7y ago
Uhh....except that they have cut prices a bunch of times in the last decade and launched cheaper storage like one zone
rsync 7y ago
"Except S3 storage isn't actually all that cheap anymore. Amazon has literally never changed the price of S3 storage over the last decade even though storage costs have plummeted over the same time period." I don't think that's true ... we (rsync.net) try to very roughly track (or beat) S3 for our cloud storage pricing and we've had to ratchet pricing down several times as a result. I don't think we just imagined it ...
skywhopper 7y ago
Please at least get your facts right. They have lowered prices and introduced less expensive options.