4 ms·
Interesting to me though that they wouldn't let a founder be there. Point aside that Uber became pretty toxic and messed up its rep. Under Kalanick it also beca
by mikejulietbravo 7y ago
Interesting to me though that they wouldn't let a founder be there. Point aside that Uber became pretty toxic and messed up its rep. Under Kalanick it also became what it is today, amassed a ton of capital, etc.
Not really defending TK here, but I think it's pretty lame that the guy who made the company what it is doesn't get to be part of what's essentially a "we made it" ceremony.
- SilasX 7y agoAccording to the article, it's because the new CEO is really trying to purge any vestige of the loose-cannon "bro" culture that he (rightly or wrongly) feels Kalanick fostered.