You obviously didn't read what I said. > There are subjective things and there are objective things. What you're doing at this moment (trying to justify both s

You obviously didn't read what I said. > There are subjective things and there are objective things. What you're doing at this moment (trying to justify both sides) is intellectually dishonest. Well you didn't really justify anything or understand what I said and then accused me of acting in bad faith. Lovely. > A child might call their parents stupid for not letting them eat candy all day. Objectively the parents are not stupid, the child has a mistaken perspective. Also the nanny state that you are promoting will have the opposite effect of what you want. Most of the places that have draconian rules are normally the places where most of the vice occurs ... it just happens out of sight of the authorities. > I hope you realize you are justifying horrible, vile speech by trying to "see both sides". I believe in freedom of speech. If people cannot say vile things they cannot be corrected by the rest of society, by silencing them you will just force it underground where it will fester. Well done you are making the problem worse.