5 ms·
Why should post-publication peer review be limited to working through Science. That will happen in due course (e.g. Rosie Redfield has already written a letter
by bbgm 16y ago
Why should post-publication peer review be limited to working through Science. That will happen in due course (e.g. Rosie Redfield has already written a letter), but it is perfectly fine for scientists to dispute the paper via their blogs, etc. We live in an era where you do have to be ready for post-publication peer review, especially if you make far reaching claims and choose to do them in a very public manner
- bhickey 16y agoI never claimed that it should be. I was just pointing out those cases that I am familiar with. What they did (press-conferences, etc.) was in poor form.