4 ms·
Your argument is that a democrat proposed a dead-on-arrival bill to cut military spending while this happened a few years later: https://www.forbes.com/sites/er
by ng12 8y ago
Your argument is that a democrat proposed a dead-on-arrival bill to cut military spending while this happened a few years later: https://www.forbes.com/sites/eriksherman/2017/09/18/91-of-senate-democrats-help-pass-the-696-5b-defense-bill/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/eriksherman/2017/09/18/91-of-se...
See my point?
- hn_throwaway_99 8y agoThis logic is completely nonsensical. Her bill was "dead on arrival" because it was opposed by Republicans. Want to change that, then elect Democrats.
- ng12 8y agoMy point is that the DOA bill was facetious. None of the current establishment democrats are serious about military spending cuts, so much so that Warren/Bernie have been making waves by suggesting they will be.