2 ms·
FYI, they compare their cifar results to [1], which is more effective than plain cutout. [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.09501 https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.09501
by p1esk 8y ago
FYI, they compare their cifar results to [1], which is more effective than plain cutout.
[1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.09501 https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.09501
- hooloovoo_zoo 8y agoHeh, I'm familiar with this one too. It implies that, for instance, the Shake-Shake and Shake-Drop papers employ cutout, which they don't report. It's hard to make apples to apples comparisons when they're changing lots of things at the same time.