4 ms·
sure, but there's a pretty literal difference between something being a requirement, and something not being a requirement.
by catshirt 16y ago
sure, but there's a pretty literal difference between something being a requirement, and something not being a requirement.
- raganwald 16y agoI said I agreed with both of the parent's points, namely: 1. That's under "Ideally", not "Requirements". 2. I think that's a great idea. :-)
- catshirt 16y agoAh- of course I did see that- but I misinterpreted the rest as a "I agree, but you could consider it a requirement because...". Rereading it I realize that's not the case. Cheers!
- davemorin 16y agoWe should probably have made this a requirement. I'll push a change now :) Also, thank you for the kind words on this. We think it is an important part of the responsibilities for this post at Path.