4 ms·
Agree, I kept re-reading, and couldn't understand what was the article saying. It just tells about how there are fitness influencers and that they obviously mak
by didibus 8y ago
Agree, I kept re-reading, and couldn't understand what was the article saying. It just tells about how there are fitness influencers and that they obviously make money off sponsored content.
The whole time, I thought it was going to say that they're not really fit at all, and are all mostly plastic surgery, implants and steroids, but not a single mention of that beyond the title and its accompanying illustration.
I also find #2 interesting. For fitness, unless your fake (which I thought the article was gonna discuss somewhat, but didn't), your creds are the photos and videos of your body and what you can do with it. That's mostly what people follow them for anyways.
- pitt1980 8y agoI think steroids are the subtext of what motivated the author to write the article. Except, 'look, these guys are all fairly obviously on steroids', is a tough thing to get past current journalistic standards