4 ms·

The bad blood between Wikileaks/Assange and The Guardian go back quite a few years. https://web.archive.org/web/20110106083508/http://www.counterpunch.org/sham

The bad blood between Wikileaks/Assange and The Guardian go back quite a few years. https://web.archive.org/web/20110106083508/http://www.counterpunch.org/shamir01052011.html https://web.archive.org/web/20110106083508/http://www.counte... https://wlcentral.org/node/839 https://wlcentral.org/node/839

shaki-dora 8y ago
The fact that you have to link to an archive copy, because even the loony bin that is “counterpunch” has chosen to disassociate with the raving anti-Semite author, speaks volumes.
- phs318u 8y ago
  1. My post offers no opinion and makes no point other than that “there was bad blood a long time ago”, offering as evidence of that some articles by known Wikileaks supporters explaining the “why” from their perspective. 2. The fact that I linked to those articles (and my own comment preceding the links), makes no claims as to the veracity of those claims. However they do underscore the fact that there was bad blood between WL and TG. 3. Your post plays the man rather than the ball to attack claims I never made (clearly however others must feel the same way you do). EDIT: correction to type of argument in point 3.