In the US there is a 1st amendment exception for obscenity under which these kind of prohibitions leverage. Obscenity itself requires an average expectation of

In the US there is a 1st amendment exception for obscenity under which these kind of prohibitions leverage. Obscenity itself requires an average expectation of what obscenity is, otherwise the exception dissipates entirely. It is therefore easy for me to see that the technological availability of this would change it. there would be attempts by executive branch and legislature that are obliged to simply say something “should” be illegal, and a court wouldnt be able to agree with that on constitutional grounds