3 ms·
I think most of us are highly invested in the value of easily-rehydratable knowledge, because an incredible amount of the first third of our lives is spent lear
by c0vfefe 7y ago
I think most of us are highly invested in the value of easily-rehydratable knowledge, because an incredible amount of the first third of our lives is spent learning facts that we'll forget. If we admitted there might be a better way, we'd have to do the hard and thankless work of institutional overhaul in our schools.
- barry-cotter 7y agoThis mistakes the purpose of school. It’s less learning than childcare for primary school, socialisation and teaching children to do apparently boring and meaningless work as directed by superiors, and ranking and proof of intelligence and conscientiousness at higher levels. We’ve known most people forget almost everything they learn at school for a very long time and spaced repetition and the forgetting curve date from Ebbinghaus (1885) while mastery learning is probably older than writing though the name dates from 1968 and the earliest unambiguous instance of the concept dates from the 1920s. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forgetting_curve https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forgetting_curve https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mastery_learning https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mastery_learning
- c0vfefe 7y agoI suppose I was taking more of an idealistic view.