4 ms·
Your comments come off as unvarnished self-promotion, which is generally frowned upon here.
by colanderman 8y ago
Your comments come off as unvarnished self-promotion, which is generally frowned upon here.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- jackfraser 8y agoI think it's good to hear someone talking about it. I've never used it - perhaps I have the impression that it's not even something I could just go sign up for with a credit card and start using as a non-business entity. But, I see things like https://github.com/IBM-Cloud/terraform-provider-ibm https://github.com/IBM-Cloud/terraform-provider-ibm exist, so it must be at least reasonably usable. What's a reason why someone would consider this over the big three, besides sweetheart deals for big customers?
- solotronics 8y agoOne of the cooler things to me is you can order an actual physical server and its entirely only yours. It gets the same infrastructure and care we give everything else but you own and control it entirely. You can select the specific components you want or select a common build that we keep prebuilt for "fast provision". These prebuilt ones are sitting ready for booting via IPMI/BOOTP so with a few clicks you can get a baremetal server thats only yours in a few minutes. You can totally lock us out of it in every way if you want to. Also, the portions of the network where this happens is not an "overlay network" so that translates to extremely predictable latency and jitter characteristics that are actually better than the others can provide. Game companies especially like this but the downside is decreased flexibility because of course its a physical server somewhere so your responsible for managing any container or VM you choose on it. We of course have container and VM and many other things as services as well.
- nixgeek 8y agoWhich is great and all, if done properly. Was this fixed properly? What’s the IBM equivalent to AWS’ Nitro or GCP’s Titan? https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/02/26/ibm_softlayer_server_security/ https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/02/26/ibm_softlayer_serve...
- colanderman 8y agoThat is fine, but entering the conversation with a comment that is self-promoting but otherwise unrelated to the conversation at hand is obnoxious, just as much so as someone doing the same for their own person at a party. If you want to promote your product, more apropos and therefore constructive would be a comment detailing why it did not suffer the same outage, or justified speculation why its competitors did. Engage in the conversation rather than just naming a list of features.