If they actually do this: "Nussbaum says Blue Heron employees will not misrepresent themselves or lie for a client. “And we will not knowingly violate any rule

If they actually do this: "Nussbaum says Blue Heron employees will not misrepresent themselves or lie for a client. “And we will not knowingly violate any rules, regulations, or laws. We will keep our client's confidence very strictly. We will never disclose the name of our client or provide any identifying information that would allow somebody else to identify our clients. We will not say we are working for X if we're working for Y. We would just decline to answer a question or say we're not at liberty to say,” he explains." Then I think it's actually a noble profession. 'Truth Hackers'. There's a big podcast on FT about these guys - they are the one's the dig out all of the corrupt dictators illegal holdings around the world (i.e. Argentina wants to default on it's loans, when a ton of money was stolen by politicos and hidden in offshore accounts, so the hedge fund managers holding the bonds want to 'find the money') and arguably that's a 'social good'. But do they stick to that moral impetus ? That's the question ...