> derailed from "privacy engineering team" which engineers privacy (whatever that means at Google) does a shitty job to Actually no, it was you who derailed an

> derailed from "privacy engineering team" which engineers privacy (whatever that means at Google) does a shitty job to Actually no, it was you who derailed an otherwise unrelated conversation to that topic. > we should celebrate them for doing just the minimum amount of work for something that has already been possible, if spread across many UIs The "minumum amount of work possible" was doing nothing. Let's isolate this: is this change a good thing, or a bad thing, in your opinion? That is, all else equal, would you prefer Google provide this specific privacy control, or not? If not, why not? What is bad about this feature? If yes, why are you attacking the very people implementing features that you think are good? Isn't it better to support the people doing work you support?