4 ms·
It would definitely hinder adoption in business.
by ben509 8y ago
It would definitely hinder adoption in business.
- Lowkeyloki 8y agoIt's long been a dream of mine to make some software package that would be immensely useful and offer it for free with the catch being that the name is something childish and embarrassing and offensive. And then maybe offer a version of it with a nice, normal, appropriate name, but charge money for that version.
- a_t48 8y ago"git"
- girzel 8y agoBeautifulSoup! It even comes with more "enterprisey" class-name aliases, if you need them.
- Lowkeyloki 8y agoWhat's wrong with "BeautifulSoup"? Is it a euphemism for another term with the initials "BS"?
- auvi 8y ago"fruity loops" had to rename to FL Studio
- teddyh 8y ago“Google”
- kitd 8y agoI worked on a product sold in the financial industry, and we wanted to ship it with a built-in 3rd-party debugger. The execs complained, so we had to buy and repackage the debugger source as "debug utility".