It's as if they want to give the illusion that Groups is in any way maintained by tacking on a half-arsed clone of Reader, and it sucks. Ignoring the impedance

It's as if they want to give the illusion that Groups is in any way maintained by tacking on a half-arsed clone of Reader, and it sucks. Ignoring the impedance mismatch between the borrowed UI and the data it projects, try clicking on a group's Settings link. They should consider devoting their apparently minimal allocation of engineering time to providing an API, and leave it to those with the time and passion to come up with a modern UI.