So it is that you have a better handle on who is "dangerous" and who is not than FB does. Why do you feel your analysis is any more valid than FB's? Just as a

So it is that you have a better handle on who is "dangerous" and who is not than FB does. Why do you feel your analysis is any more valid than FB's? Just as a matter of full disclosure, my position is, FB's private property, FB's rules. Just like my house, or yours I suspect, if you don't like the rules you have to leave. So that's my position on this whole thing. I'm just wondering why you think we should trust your word over FB's?