3 ms·
My understanding is that the conviction was for deliberately (disregarding the accused's claim to the contrary) publicly sharing his employer's proprietary sour
by gnode 7y ago
My understanding is that the conviction was for deliberately (disregarding the accused's claim to the contrary) publicly sharing his employer's proprietary source code and private keys. Assuming this is actually true, then it's justified that there are legal consequences for sabotaging his employer like this, and most countries have laws penalising such behaviour.
- craftyguy 7y agoMeanwhile, companies and governments are allowed to 'accidentally' expose all sorts of private information about millions of people without any meaningful punishment.
- londons_explore 7y agoDJI should take the majority of the blame for not protecting its private keys with hardware security modules.