5 ms·
And in Russia they ban instead this or that free speech advocate. And in China it is some other group of people that cannot speak. And in India, and in Brasil,
by sasasassy 7y ago
And in Russia they ban instead this or that free speech advocate. And in China it is some other group of people that cannot speak. And in India, and in Brasil, Iran, Pakistan, UK, etc. There are always offensive people or sensitive subjects.
The only question is Facebook going to ban each group of people per country basis or globally. If globally, we are going to have a very limited, gray area of speech in Facebook.
- lotsofpulp 7y agoOnly happy birthdays, congrats for graduations/wedding/babies/house, and condolences for deaths.
- yostrovs 7y agoJehovah Witnesses don't celebrate birthdays or any other holiday. To them it's wrong to single out any specific day among the majesty of all the days that God created.
- badger_bravo 7y agoI'm against Jehovah's Witnesses but that's a very pretty thought.
- sigzero 7y agoThat isn't why at all. They believe it is of pagan origin and no birthdays were celebrated in the Bible that didn't turn out badly.
- aklemm 7y agoWe don't need free speech on Facebook, but we do on the Internet. That's the difference in Russia and China, etc.
- mrmuagi 7y agoSorry to sound like I'm trying to gotcha you, but how on earth isn't Facebook a large subset of the Internet?
- aklemm 7y agoOf course it is, but it’s not THE Internet and we don’t want it to be. It’s also a commercial emtity while the Internet May be considered more of a public good.
- mrmuagi 7y agoI see, you make the distinction based on public vs. private. The weird thing is, isn't this just giving private companies the ability to have a more lax set of standards then one we would place on a public good? This seems to just incentives public->private good conversion more, for they don't have to play by the public good playbook.
- ShorsHammer 7y agoIn many parts of the world it definitely is THE internet. Nearly every business on my street uses Facebook as their webpage. It's incredibly rare to see local businesses here with their own proper site.
- emilfihlman 7y agoSo do share: most of the Internet is owned by corporations. Which part of that should be free speech protected? Should Google DNS be able to pick and choose? How about routing certain IPs? Why not? IPs are sold and corporations own those just fine and DNS is an open system, just set up your own and don't act entitled! The cognitive dissonance plaguing most people in this matter is absolutely astonishing.