Recent cases are taking things to the point where it might soon be difficult for senior executives to own stock without a blind trust. Superficially this doesn

Recent cases are taking things to the point where it might soon be difficult for senior executives to own stock without a blind trust. Superficially this doesn't seem like a crazy idea - or at least it seems plausible to set it up well. I get the thinking that execs holding equity gives them more skin in the game, but it also seems to often lead to poorly matched incentives, and a reward structure that is only loosely coupled to real performance.