The one thing that’s nice about CL is the system images. Racket doesn’t have a similar concept: you can’t REPL into running systems and update the image on the

The one thing that’s nice about CL is the system images. Racket doesn’t have a similar concept: you can’t REPL into running systems and update the image on the fly (as far as I know). Nor can you save the corrent state of the program to disk for restarts. A lot of times I find that feature of CL more confusing than helpful: your system is no longer a derivative of your source.