> I think overloadable and definable operators can be very useful (like Haskell, OCaml), and that's probably as much syntactic flexibility as we need. Even this

> I think overloadable and definable operators can be very useful (like Haskell, OCaml), and that's probably as much syntactic flexibility as we need. Even this can be abused though. I remember being very concerned about the performance of some Ocaml code that was overriding (* *) until I realised what it was doing :) Not sure how to type that on HN!