4 ms·
Can you answer why this is a problem in terms of costs and benefits presupposing that there is no inherent value to human life? If you argue with certain moral
by Kaiyou 8y ago
Can you answer why this is a problem in terms of costs and benefits presupposing that there is no inherent value to human life? If you argue with certain moral beliefs at your core your probably only reaching deaf ears from key figures that could help change things. Appealing to someone's self-interest is more efficient.
- ATsch 8y ago> presupposing that there is no inherent value to human life I mean, you can argue anything if you make your assumptions ridiculous enough. If your approach is to let other people die because that's more efficient then sorry, I'm not very open to your arguments about self-interest. (I don't want to engage in too much character assassination but: There's this joke that within the first few pages of the comments of any Libertarian account, you will find them defending pedophilia in some way. I'm pleased to say that this rule still applies)
- Kaiyou 8y agoYour problem seems to be, that you need arguments to convince someone to do something that you want him to do. I don't care if you're not convinced. I don't need you doing something for my benefit.