3 ms·
You are claiming that the accuracy of Telsas language is outrageously deceptive, using an outrageously made up example of deception: "six seconds prior to the c
by strainer 7y ago
You are claiming that the accuracy of Telsas language is outrageously deceptive, using an outrageously made up example of deception: "six seconds prior to the collision = It is any six seconds before the crash"
"This is the kind of sketchiness that makes people wary of Tesla."
Its the kind of sketchiness that make me wary of the stuff people post about Tesla. If the driver had multiple warnings - about anything, any car company will mention that, there is nothing exceptionally sketchy about Tesla doing so. And that is all on which you based your incredible interpretation of "six seconds prior to". Its just an entirely made up accusation.
- studentrob 7y agoAccording to Tesla, > the only way for this accident to have occurred is if Mr. Huang was not paying attention to the road [1] Tesla has made a habit of drawing conclusions about investigations that have just begun. It is sketchy, and people have noticed. [1] https://www.businessinsider.com/tesla-says-fatal-model-x-autopilot-crash-caused-driver-2018-4 https://www.businessinsider.com/tesla-says-fatal-model-x-aut...
- strainer 7y agoAnd how does that or the vaguely introduced link justify accusations of outrageous rhetorical trickery ?
- jsight 7y agoI don't understand. What other theory are you proposing than that he wasn't paying attention?
- studentrob 7y agoAccording to the preliminary report from the NTSB, > At 3 seconds prior to the crash and up to the time of impact with the crash attenuator, the Tesla’s speed increased from 62 to 70.8 mph, with no precrash braking or evasive steering movement detected. [1] This means the vehicle gave the driver less time to respond. I'd argue the manufacturer bears some responsibility. [1] https://ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/HWY18FH011-preliminary.pdf https://ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/HWY1...