4 ms·
I think it's very good of the management at Twitter that they have a policy of not censoring democratic leaders. I'm hopeful that there won't ever be a tipping
by lucozade 7y ago
I think it's very good of the management at Twitter that they have a policy of not censoring democratic leaders. I'm hopeful that there won't ever be a tipping point on the basis that it's probably a financially good decision as well as a politically fair one.
There's no need for a thought experiment though. We know exactly what the world is like without the likes of Twitter and Facebook. What it looks like is a world where most information is very heavily filtered by a very small, self-selecting group. And through channels that were, usually, heavily editorialised and explicitly biased.
I think it's too early to say whether they are a net force for good or not. My gut feeling is that they will push democracies to be much more direct than representative. I happen to think that this is likely to be a really bad thing but I don't know that for a fact.
- quietthrow 7y ago- the group may not be small here but the platform that enable this is run by a as you say small and self selecting group. In addition small self-selecting groups can exploit the masses as have been shown. -net net you are saying that twitter/fb will force democracies to be direct and in your personal opinion is a really bad thing but you are giving the benefit of doubt. Jury is out there but today we can see that because of these technologies democracies have been divided like never before and that is a fact.