Yah both of these points are valid. I had a good discussion with one of my dad's friends recently (who is a realtor), and mentioned that one of the biggest cos

Yah both of these points are valid. I had a good discussion with one of my dad's friends recently (who is a realtor), and mentioned that one of the biggest costs we never talk about is the cost of compliance. Basically, his argument is that the cost of existing housing is driven by the cost of building new housing, of which places like San Francisco have been very effective at limiting! But as well as that, what are the development fees for example? When politicians virtue signal about what percentage of a housing development will be below market rate for example, you have to remember that this sort of thing will be factored into the price you pay. Or the endless studies that city governments (again looking square at you San Francisco) commission. The buyer and the renter pay for these. America actually has relatively cheap housing across the vast majority of the country, so it's not as if the buildings themselves are the major factor in jacking up the prices.