3 ms·
I think they were talking about the GP's hypothetical scenario, where renting would be llegal.
by dgzl 7y ago
I think they were talking about the GP's hypothetical scenario, where renting would be llegal.
- AnimalMuppet 7y agoSo the claim is that verisimilitude's suggestion, that renting would be illegal, is a gateway the government owning all property and private ownership being illegal? I don't see how it's reasonable to suppose that would be the result. I also don't see how MagicPropmaker thinks that's what verisimilitude was thinking. Am I missing something? [Edit: I mean, I can see that renting being illegal is a restriction on use of property. That's a long distance from private property itself being illegal, though, and I don't see any reason to suppose that would be the end result - either the desired end result or the actual one.]