4 ms·
I’m thinking the lab tech or field researcher most probably accidentally contaminated the samples
by ionwake 7y ago
I’m thinking the lab tech or field researcher most probably accidentally contaminated the samples
- m463 7y agoI think of the criminal case years and years ago where someone was arrested with a large sum of cash, and they asserted it was drug money because cocaine was found on the bills. The defending lawyer just took a random sample of money from circulation and found the same thing. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1994-11-13-me-62172-story.html https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1994-11-13-me-62172-... and if you look further, even ATMs get in on the game, by spreading it on other bills that pass through the mechanisms: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/cocaine-on-money/ https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/cocaine-on-money/ So by the same token, I wonder how many ways the samples can be contaminated, the obvious one being someone touches money first.