3 ms·
That quote I posted was the sentences just before the ones you selected. Why don't you read the paper a bit - https://arxiv.org/pdf/1812.07179.pdf https://arx
by WhatIsDukkha 7y ago
That quote I posted was the sentences just before the ones you selected.
Why don't you read the paper a bit -
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1812.07179.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/1812.07179.pdf
And then work out why they used the words "birds eye" that you found so upsetting.
- gamblor956 7y agoThanks for the paper. I actually agree with those complaining about the methodology of the paper and if anything, having read the article I agree it even more strongly states why LIDAR is essential for the foreseeable future. The research paper, in a nutshell, was about transforming stereovisual images to psuedo-birds eye data, like roof-mounted LIDAR. This, theoretically, would result in about a 350% improvement over current vision-based methods...but still only 50% of that of existing LIDAR systems. In exchange, you just have to 1) convert the stereovisual data to a 3d point cloud, 2) transform the point cloud to birds-eye perspective, and 3) run the LIDAR systems on the point cloud, and 4) do that all in milli-seconds.