> I'm not seeing the incentive for someone in testing to fake results on their own. There's a lot of missing details, so it's hard to know. From the descriptio

> I'm not seeing the incentive for someone in testing to fake results on their own. There's a lot of missing details, so it's hard to know. From the description of what he did, it seems the interest was not so much in generating false results, but cutting corners, such as running the tests quicker than was allowable. This could have been to make up for some shortfall in lab throughput, for instance. Also, it sounds like he was in charge of the lab, so fairly high up. That position may have come with substantial performance related incentives.