4 ms·
> Busses are such good vehicles for batteries, that for some routes it may even make sense to run them with super-capacitors, with chargers embedded in the road
by chriswarbo 8y ago
> Busses are such good vehicles for batteries, that for some routes it may even make sense to run them with super-capacitors, with chargers embedded in the road at stops.
I would think busses are a very poor fit for batteries: their economics favours driving around for as long as possible (switching drivers in shifts). Any time spent charging is a waste.
This is less favourable than a consumer car, which sits around unused for most of the time (hence easily charged) and usually only makes a few short trips a day (e.g. commute).
I can understand the desire for supercapacitors on busses, since they are much quicker to charge than batteries. Putting chargers in the stops is a way to mitigate the low energy density of supercapacitors: they only need to last as far as the next charging point.
I think supercapacitors + fast charging stops makes busses very suited for electricity; but I don't think they're best suited for batteries (the fact that there are battery-powered busses shows that there's enough wiggle-room in the economics that they can work despite this unsuitability).
- bobthepanda 8y ago> they only need to last as far as the next charging point. You had better hope that your bus doesn't get stuck in traffic on the way there, then.
- chriswarbo 8y agoWhy? That's part and parcel of lasting as far as the next charging point. I didn't say "assuming no traffic" or similar, because that would be silly. You seem to be critiquing an incredibly flimsy straw man.