3 ms·

Here is but one discussion out of the numerous discussions refuting pipenv, - https://chriswarrick.com/blog/2018/07/17/pipenv-promises-a-lot-delivers-very-litt

• throwaway5752 8y ago
  "I haven’t tried it, but I consider Conda/Anaconda unnecessary for most use-cases. Most stuff that used to be difficult to compile/install should now be available as PyPI wheels for multiple platforms." https://chriswarrick.com/blog/2018/07/17/pipenv-promises-a-lot-delivers-very-little/#isso-178 https://chriswarrick.com/blog/2018/07/17/pipenv-promises-a-l... That is the author of that blog post, replying to a comment there.
  • mlthoughts2018 8y ago
    So the author, who hasn’t tried conda, dismisses it. What is your point? How does this relate to the criticisms of pipenv?
• Sean1708 8y ago
  So what about the "and similar approaches" part of your comment? The author seems to have only minor issues with Poetry (for example) and I agree with him, it fixes or provides simple workarounds for all the major pain points of Pipenv as far as I can tell.