I don't use PyQt's documentation (wasn't even aware it really existed), it's such a literal wrapper that you can just use Qt's documentation. And the only chur

I don't use PyQt's documentation (wasn't even aware it really existed), it's such a literal wrapper that you can just use Qt's documentation. And the only churn was a change about five years ago from a less pythonic API (using wrapped Qt types for most things) to a more pythonic one (using Python's native types where it makes sense). And that wasn't even that bad. Other than that it has no more churn than Qt itself does.