3 ms·
I believe the profit motive made it wrong, yes. It creates a fundamental conflict of interest in the allocation of taxpayer resources. This might not have been
by reitzensteinm 8y ago
I believe the profit motive made it wrong, yes. It creates a fundamental conflict of interest in the allocation of taxpayer resources.
This might not have been a severe case, but NASA was absolutely right to come down on it hard.
- TheSpiceIsLife 8y agoOr, it demonstrates a lack of foresight by NASA to take advantage of an opportunity to sell a bunch of stamps over the following decades at wildly inflated prices. There must be at least a handful of items that don't weight a lot per 1000 units that could have gone to the moon and back. I'm thinking pretty much any paper document or certificate, cash notes.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- dr_dshiv 8y agoThat's how Hearst funded the first round-the-world flight, on the Grad Zeppelin. Novelty stamps! But mixed motivations can be confusing and demotivating.